Josh Harris Josh Harris's Profile Page

Josh Harris Josh Harris

0 Course Enrolled • 0 Course Completed

Biography

CTFL-AT試験の準備方法｜効率的なCTFL-AT日本語講座試験｜高品質なISTQB Certified Tester - Foundation Level Extension - Agile Tester試験対応

無料でクラウドストレージから最新のMogiExam CTFL-AT PDFダンプをダウンロードする：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YwmovHkoI6Lryt4idtAgtyphOdjTfWm5

MogiExamのISQI CTFL-AT問題集は専門家たちが数年間で過去のデータから分析して作成されて、試験にカバーする範囲は広くて、受験生の皆様のお金と時間を節約します。我々CTFL-AT問題集の通過率は高いので、90％の合格率を保証します。あなたは弊社の高品質ISQI CTFL-AT試験資料を利用して、一回に試験に合格します。

CTFL-AT認定試験は、アジャイル方法論にすでに精通しており、アジャイル環境で働いた経験があるソフトウェアテスターを対象としています。この試験では、アジャイル開発、原則、方法、技術など、さまざまなトピックをカバーしています。 CTFL-AT試験に合格したテスターは、アジャイルテストの原則を確実に理解し、この知識を自分の仕事に適用できるようになります。

>> CTFL-AT日本語講座 <<

ISQI CTFL-AT試験対応 & CTFL-AT日本語版と英語版

ユーザーエクスペリエンスの向上を常に目指しています。 CTFL-ATテストガイドを購入する前にPDFバージョンのデモをダウンロードして、その内容を簡単に見て、CTFL-AT試験を理解してください。 CTFL-ATの実際の質問を知ったら、購入するかどうかを決めることができます。プロセスは静かでシンプルです。あなたがする必要があるのは、当社のウェブサイトにアクセスして無料のデモをダウンロードすることです。これにより多くの時間を節約でき、CTFL-AT試験問題の合格率は98％以上なので、CTFL-ATテストガイドで満足する可能性が高くなります。

ISQI ISTQB Certified Tester - Foundation Level Extension - Agile Tester 認定 CTFL-AT 試験問題 (Q65-Q70):

質問 # 65
Which of the following is the BEST way for a test team to keep its independence when working in an Agile development environment?

A. Co-locate only some of the testers with the Agile development team, while the rest of the testers are in a different location.
B. Locate the team that develops the test automation framework in a different location to the Agile development team.
C. Assign testers to be members of the Agile team, but ensure the testers report to a different manager than the developers.
D. Share the Test Strategy with the Agile development team, but not the details of the Test Cases.

正解：C

解説：
According to the ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, one of the key principles of agile testing is that testers are integrated into the agile team and work closely with developers and other stakeholders. However, this does not mean that testers lose their independence or objectivity. Testers should still be able to provide an unbiased view of the quality of the software and challenge the assumptions and decisions made by the team. Therefore, option C is the best way for a test team to keep its independence when working in an agile development environment, as it allows testers to be part of the agile team, but also report to a different manager than the developers, who can support their professional development and ensure their independence. Option A is not a good way to keep independence, as it limits the transparency and collaboration between testers and developers, which are essential for agile testing. Option B is also not a good way to keep independence, as it creates a physical and organizational barrier between the test automation team and the agile development team, which can hinder communication and feedback. Option D is also not a good way to keep independence, as it creates an inconsistency and imbalance between the testers who are co- located with the agile development team and those who are not, which can affect the quality and efficiency of the testing process. References: ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 1.2.1, page
91; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 1.2.2, page 101; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.1.1, page 141; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.2.1, page 161; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.2.2, page 171.

質問 # 66
During a retrospective, which of the following items would be the LEAST effective to generate discussions on process improvement?

A. The automation tests failed frequently without any logs to help in debugging the failure reason.
B. The build process was slow and this often caused delays waiting for the build to complete.
C. One of the testers was regarded as being both disruptive and lazy and did not contribute to team success.
D. For the last sprint the estimated and actual effort were much higher than the team capacity.

正解：C

解説：
Explanation
According to the ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, a retrospective is a meeting held at the end of each iteration or release, where the agile team reflects on what went well and what can be improved in their processes, practices, and interactions. The purpose of a retrospective is to identify and implement actions for continuous improvement, and to foster a culture of learning and collaboration. Therefore, the items that would be the most effective to generate discussions on process improvement are those that are related to the team's performance, challenges, feedback, and suggestions. Option D is the least effective item to generate discussions on process improvement, as it is a personal attack on one of the team members, and it does not offer any constructive feedback or solution. This kind of item can create a negative and hostile atmosphere in the retrospective, and damage the trust and respect among the team members. Option A is an effective item to generate discussions on processimprovement, as it identifies a problem with the build process that affects the team's efficiency and quality, and it can lead to finding ways to optimize the build process or to mitigate the delays. Option B is also an effective item to generate discussions on process improvement, as it reveals a discrepancy between the team's estimation and actual effort, and it can lead to analyzing the root causes of the deviation and to improving the estimation techniques or the team's capacity. Option C is also an effective item to generate discussions on process improvement, as it highlights a weakness in the automation tests that hinders the team's ability to debug and fix the failures, and it can lead to enhancing the automation tests with better logging mechanisms or to reviewing the automation strategy. References: ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.1.1, page 14; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.1.2, page 15; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.2.1, page 16; ISTQB Tester Foundation Level Agile Tester syllabus, section 2.2.2, page 17.

質問 # 67
Which of the following statements about Agile retrospectives is CORRECT?

A. In an Agile retrospective the moderator can encourage and make sure that good practices are kept by the team, by asking what the team is doing well.
B. During Agile retrospectives, testers should be encouraged to provide constructive suggestions only on non-testing activities.
C. Agile retrospectives should be focused mainly on impediments that are outside the control of the team because these issues are more challenging.
D. Unlike working sessions or meetings held in non-Agile projects, Agile retrospectives do not require follow-up activities.

正解：A

質問 # 68
Which of the following statements about iteration and release planning is true?

A. During release planning, testers establish and prioritize the user stories for the release and then participate in the quality risk analysis for these stories
B. During release planning, testers add value by breaking down user stories into tasks (particularly testing tasks)
C. Release planning defines and re-defines the product backlog and provides the basis for a test approach and test plan spanning all iterations
D. Release plans cannot change as an Agile project proceeds, but iteration plans may change to accommodate new needs

正解：A

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
From theCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 2.2Release and Iteration Planning, testers actively contribute during release planning:
"During release planning, testers collaborate with the team to understand the scope of the release and help identify any high-level test considerations. They also participate in quality risk analysis and help in estimating test effort." Furthermore, it is noted:
"Testers are involved in defining and refining user stories and acceptance criteria, and contribute to quality risk assessments." Therefore,Option Cis accurate as it reflects the tester's involvement inprioritizing user storiesand conducting quality risk analysisduring release planning.
* Option Ais incorrect because defining and redefining the product backlog is primarily the role of the Product Owner, and the test approach isiteration-specific, not fixed for the full release.
* Option Bis inaccurate - breaking down stories into tasks is generally part ofiteration (Sprint) planning, not release planning.
* Option Dis incorrect -release plans can changein Agile to accommodate changing business needs.
References:
CTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 2.2
Learning Objective (K2) - Understand the role of the tester in release and iteration planning

質問 # 69
An Agile team is working on a project to develop an image editing tool. In the current version, the
'Settings' GUI allows users to adjust exposure, contrast, and saturation. A session-based exploratory testing session is planned to find issues with parameter combinations that cause undesired image effects.
Which of the following would you expect to be the best charter to support this exploratory testing session?

A. Explore 'Settings' with many values of exposure, applied on different images, to discover unexpected effects on those images
B. Explore 'Settings' with many combinations of the values of exposure, contrast, and saturation, applied on different images, to discover unexpected effects on those images
C. Explore 'Settings' to discover unexpected effects on those images
D. Explore 'Settings' working on different images by setting exposure, contrast, and saturation at their minimum, then setting exposure and contrast at maximum while keeping saturation at minimum, to discover unexpected effects

正解：B

解説：
Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:
FromCTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 3.1Exploratory Testing, it defines atest charteras:
"A mission statement defining what to test, how it can be tested, and what issues to look for. Effective charters support focused yet flexible exploration." Option Bis the best because it specifies:
* Thearea of the system under test
* Theparameters involved
* Theapproach(combinations)
* Thegoal(discover unexpected effects)
* Option Afocuses only onone parameter.
* Option Cistoo vague.
* Option Dis tooprescriptiveand limits exploration.
References:
CTFL-AT Syllabus v4.0, Section 3.1
Learning Objective (K3) - Design effective exploratory test charters

質問 # 70
......

安全で信頼できるウェブサイトとして、あなたの個人情報の隠しとお支払いの安全性を保障していますから、弊社のISQIのCTFL-AT試験ソフトを安心にお買いください。弊社のMogiExamは最大なるIT試験のための資料庫ですので、ほかの試験に興味があるなら、MogiExamで探したり、弊社の係員に問い合わせたりすることができます。心よりご成功を祈ります。

CTFL-AT試験対応: https://www.mogiexam.com/CTFL-AT-exam.html

ISQI CTFL-AT日本語講座成功を受けたいあなたはすぐに行動しませんでしょうか、MogiExam CTFL-AT試験対応は成功の扉ですから、 MogiExam CTFL-AT試験対応を利用してください、ISQI CTFL-AT日本語講座お客様のニーズから考慮することから、あなたのようなより多くの成功した人々を引き付けるために、サービスが大きな違いを生むと言わなければなりません、ISQI CTFL-AT日本語講座どの方法が有効であるかを知っていますか、CTFL-AT試験に合格して証明書を取得するだけなので、まともな仕事を得て、より多くのお金を稼ぐことができます。

プレムについての私の最大の不満は、彼が十分に書く必要がなかったということでCTFL-ATす、屋敷が燃える、成功を受けたいあなたはすぐに行動しませんでしょうか、MogiExamは成功の扉ですから、 MogiExamを利用してください。

試験の準備方法-効果的なCTFL-AT日本語講座試験-認定するCTFL-AT試験対応

お客様のニーズから考慮することから、あなたのようなより多くの成功した人々を引き付けるために、サービスが大きな違いを生むと言わなければなりません、どの方法が有効であるかを知っていますか、CTFL-AT試験に合格して証明書を取得するだけなので、まともな仕事を得て、より多くのお金を稼ぐことができます。

ちなみに、MogiExam CTFL-ATの一部をクラウドストレージからダウンロードできます：https://drive.google.com/open?id=1YwmovHkoI6Lryt4idtAgtyphOdjTfWm5

WIRELESS MEDIA

Leading Through Innovation

About us

Quick links

Get in Touch